Propensity for Superstitious Learning at Work operationalized in three dimensions: overconfidence, lack of reflection, and late and ambiguous feedback
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol42.e202610337Keywords:
Superstitious learning; Overconfidence; Late feedbackAbstract
The aim of the article was to operationalize the propensity for superstitious learning (PSL) as a three-dimensional construct: overconfidence, lack of reflection, and late and ambiguous feedback, with dependent variables being complaints, rework, and errors at work. PSL occurs when the learning experience is convincing but the connections between causes and effects are incorrect. A total of 173 valid responses were obtained and analyzed using SmartPLS 4 software. The late feedback item was excluded because it showed a non-significant factor load, and it was grouped with the ambiguous feedback construct due to a high correlation. These modifications met the criteria for validity and reliability. The relationship between late and ambiguous feedback and the frequency of complaints, rework, and errors was confirmed. It is noteworthy the development of the late/ambiguous feedback scale and the warning about the importance of reflection, even in the face of positive results
Downloads
References
Andiola, L. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2018). Delivering the “tough message”: Moderators of subordinate auditors’ reactions to feedback. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70(March 2016), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.02.002
Annosi, M. C., Martini, A., Brunetta, F., & Marchegiani, L. (2020). Learning in an agile setting: A multilevel research study on the evolution of organizational routines. Journal of Business Research, 110, 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.011
Benegal, S., & Motta, M. (2023). Overconfident, resentful, and misinformed: How racial animus motivates confidence in false beliefs. Social Science Quarterly, 104(5), 947–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13224
Berends, H., & Antonacopoulou, E. (2014). Time and organizational learning: A review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12029
Bido, D. S., & Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545
Bollen, K. A.; Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in Measurement Models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0024448
Carolis, D. M., & Patrick, S. (2006). Social Capital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theoretical Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, 41–56.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Denis, J. L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2011). Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organization Science, 22(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0501.
Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Levinthal, D. A. (2004). From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Science, 50(10), 1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0271.
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications.
Groot, E., Endedijk, M. D., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Simons, P. R. J., & van Beukelen, P. (2014). Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2013.779240
Dunning, D. (2011). The dunning-kruger effect. On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1o ed, Vol. 44). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. ., & Black, W. C. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6a Ed). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed. SAGE Publications
Hånell, S. M., Rovira Nordman, E., & Mattsson, L. G. (2021). The nature of individual experiential knowledge in internationalizing SMEs: pitfalls of superstitious learning and the need for wisdom. International Marketing Review, 38(2), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2019-0086
Heimeriks, K. H. (2010). Confident or Competent? How to Avoid Superstitious Learning in Alliance Portfolios. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.10.004
Henningsson, S. (2015). Learning to acquire: How serial acquirers build organisational knowledge for information systems integration. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.18
Hofmann, G., Seljan, S., & Dunđer, I. (2024). Information and Feedback in Professional Communication in a Medical Setting. TEM Journal, 13(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-10
Hu, J., Zhang, S., Lount, R. B., & Tepper, B. J. (2024). When leaders heed the lessons of mistakes: Linking leaders’ recall of learning from mistakes to expressed humility. Personnel Psychology, 77(2), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12570
Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2015). The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 1960–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2333
Kim, D. H., & Senge, P. M. (1994). Putting systems thinking into practice. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100213
Kim, J. Y., Kim, J. Y. J., & Miner, A. S. (2009). Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: The impact of success and recovery experience. Organization Science, 20(6), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0439
Lee, W. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2023). Workplace learning strategies, enablers, and challenges in the context of digital innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2022-0045
Levinthal, D. A., & Rerup, C. (2021). The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organization Science, 32(3), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1383
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss4.1427
Maula, M., Heimeriks, K. H., & Keil, T. (2023). Organizational experience and performance: A systematic review and contingency framework. Academy of Management Annals, 17(2), 546–585. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0073
Miller, J. I. (2012). The mortality problem of learning and mimetic practice in emerging industries: dying to be legitimate. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Oliveira, M. F., Santos, E., & Ratten, V. (2023). Strategic perspective of error management, the role of leadership, and an error management culture: a mediation model. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2022-0028
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
Perks, K. J., & Hughes, M. (2008). Entrepreneurial decision-making in internationalization: Propositions from mid-size firms. International Business Review, 17(3), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2007.10.001.
Pozner, J. E., Stimmler, M. K., & Hirsch, P. M. (2010). Terminal isomorphism and the self-destructive potential of success: Lessons from subprime mortgage origination and securitization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 30(PART A), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)000030a010
Rerup, C. (2009). Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organization Science, 20(5), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0467
Rerup, C., & Spencer, B. (2024). Learning and interpretation in a world of disinformation: Footnotes on ignorance, conflict, and ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101358
Ringle, C. M., Silva, D., & Bido, D. D. S. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717
Rouby, E., & Thomas, C. (2023). From Individual to Collective Qualities of Attention in Dynamic Work Settings: Learning Barriers to the Development of Collective Mindful Attention. Management (France), 26(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.4541
Rudolph, J. W., & Morrison, J. B. (2008). Sidestepping Superstitious Learning, Ambiguity, and Other Roadblocks: A Feedback Model of Diagnostic Problem Solving. American Journal of Medicine, 121(5 SUPPL.), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.003
Serenko, A. (2024). Practical wisdom in the workplace: conceptualization, instrument development, and predictive power. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2023-0713
Skinner, B. F. (1948). 'Superstition' in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055873
Storey, J., & Barnett, E. (2000). Knowledge management initiatives: Learning from failure. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010372279
Szulansk, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17(Knowledge and the Firm), 27–43.
Van De Ven, A. H., & Polley, D. (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 12(3), 391–392. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.12.3.391.10102
Wilhelm, H., Richter, A. W., & Semrau, T. (2019). Employee learning from failure: A team-as-resource perspective. Organization Science, 30(4), 694–714. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1255
Zhang, Q. W., Liao, P. C., Liang, M., & Chan, A. P. C. (2024). Critical factors influencing learning from quality failures in the construction of grid infrastructure. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(4), 1730–1750. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2022-0229
Zollo, M. (2009). Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organization Science, 20(5), 894–908. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0459
Zollo, M., & Reuer, J. J. (2010). Experience spillovers across corporate development activities. Organization Science, 21(6), 1195–1212. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0474
Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1233–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.426
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Walter Shuiti Kussano, Diógenes de Souza Bido (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista. - Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).














