Fatores determinantes do uso ou desuso da informação na Wikipédia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13037/ria.vol6n1.1078Palavras-chave:
Wikipédia, Uso da Informação, Uso da TecnologiaResumo
A Wikipédia, maior enciclopédia multilíngue de conteúdos livres na Internet, é muito popular entre os estudantes. No entanto, fica a questão: a Wikipédia é uma bênção ou uma desgraça para os alunos da sociedade contemporânea? Este trabalho descreve um estudo empírico com o propósito de investigar os fatores determinantes do uso ou desuso da informação na Wikipédia. Optou-se aqui por se desenvolver um modelo de pesquisa com base na Teoria Unificada de Aceitação e Uso de Tecnologia (Uataut). Setenta e três estudantes de uma universidade local tomaram parte na pesquisa. Os resultados indicam que a expectativa de desempenho dos entrevistados, a expectativa de esforço e a influência social foram aspectos significativos na promoção da utilização da informação. O artigo se conclui com implicações para os educadores.Downloads
Referências
AJZEN, Icek. The theory of planned behavior.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991.
ALMEIDA, Rodrigo B.; MOZAFARI, Barzan & CHO, Junghoo. On the evolution of Wikipedia. In: 1st INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEBLOGS AND SOCIAL MEDIA – ICWSM 2007. Proceedings of... Boulder: AAAI, 2007.
ANDERSON, John E. & SCHWAGER, Paul H. SME adoption of wireless LAN technology: applying the UTAUT mode. In: 7th ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Proceedings of... Savannah: Sais, 2004. p. 39-43.
ARMITAGE, Chris J. & CONNER, Mark. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 40, pt. 4, p. 471-499, December, 2001.
BANDURA, Albert. Social cognitive theory in cultural context: an international review. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 51, n. 2, p. 269-290, 2002.
CHAU, Patrick Y. K. & HU, Paul Jen-Hwa. Information technology acceptance by professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, v. 32, n. 4, p. 699-719, December, 2001.
COMPEAU, Deborah R. & HIGGINS, Christopher A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, v. 6, n. 2, p. 118-143, June, 1995a.
______. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, v. 19, n. 2, p. 189-211, June, 1995b.
COMPEAU, Deborah; HIGGINS, Christopher A. & HUFF, Sid L. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, v. 23, n. 2, p. 145-158, June, 1999.
DAVIS, Fred D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340, September, 1989.
______. User acceptance of information technology; system characteristics, use perceptions, and behavior impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v. 38, n. 3, p. 475-487, March, 1993.
DAVIS, Fred D.; BAGOZZI, Richard P. & WARSHAW, Paul R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 22, n. 14, p. 1.111-1.132, July, 1992.
DECI, Edward L. & RYAN, Richard M. Intrinsic motivation and self-de-termination in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
FISHBEIN, Martin & AJZEN, Icek. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, 1975.
FITZGERALD, Lynda M.; KIEL, Geoffrey C. & BOYLE, Maree V. An exploratory study of consumers’ perceptions and experiences with on-line purchasing. In: CHETTY, Sylvie & COLLINS, Brett (Eds.). Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. Bridging marketing theory and practice. Auckland, NZ: Massey University, 2001.
FRANCIK, Ellen; RUDMAN, Susan E.; COOPER, Donna & LEVINE, Stephen. Putting innovation to work: adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems. Communications of the ACM Archive, v. 34, n. 12, p. 52-63, December, 1991.
GARFIELD, Monica J. Acceptance of ubiquitous computing. Information Systems Management, v. 22, n. 4, p. 24-31, 2005.
GILES, Jim. Special report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, v. 438, p. 900-901, December, 2005. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html. Retrieved: July 12, 2008.
GLASSBERG, Bonnie C; GROVER, Varun & TENG, James T. C. Information systems research with an attitude. Database for Advances in Information Systems, v. 37, n. 2-3, p. 76-86, Spring-Summer, 2006.
HARRISON, Allison W.; RAINER JR., R. Kelly; HOCHWARTER, Wayne A. & THOMPSON, Kenneth R. Testing the self-efficacy performance linkage of social-cognitive theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, v. 137, n. 1, p. 79-87, February, 1997.
HAUSENBLAS, Heather A.; CARRON, Albert V. & MACK, Diane A. Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 36-51, 1997.
HILLEMANN, Eric. Using Wikipedia. Carleton College, 2008. Available at: http://apps.carleton.edu/campus/library/for_faculty/faculty_find/wikipedia/. Retrieved: July 12, 2008.
HU, Paul J.; CHAU, Patrick Y. K.; SHENG, Olivia R. L. & TAM, Kar Y. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 16, n. 2, p. 91-112, Fall, 1999.
IGBARIA, Magid. An examination of the factors contributing to microcomputer technology acceptance, accounting. Management and Information Technologies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 205-224, 1994.
JASCHIK, Scott. A stand against Wikipedia. Inside Higher ED, January, 2007. Available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/01/26/wiki. Retrieved: August 2, 2008.
JIANG, James J.; HSU, Maxwell K.; KLEIN, Gary & Lin, B. E-commerce user behavior model: an empirical study. Human Systems Management, v. 19, n. 4, p. 265-276, 2000.
KARAHANNA, Elena; STRAUB, Detmar W. & CHERVANY, Norman L. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, v. 23, n. 2, p. 183-213, June, 1999.
LANDIS, Dan: TRIANDIS, Harry C. & ADAMOPOULOS, John. Habit and behavioral intentions as predictors of social behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, v. 106, p. 227-237, 1978.
LANDRY, Brett J. L. & GRIFFETH, Rodger, HARTMAN, Sandra. Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, v. 4, n. 1, p. 87-99, January, 2006.
LEGRIS, Paul; INGHAM, John & COLLERETTE, Pierre. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 191-204, January, 2003.
LEONE, Luigi D.; PERUGINI, Marco & ERCOLANI, Anna Paola. A comparison of three models of attitude-behavior relationships on studying behavior domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 29, n. 2-3, p. 161-189, March/May, 1999.
LOCKE, Edwin A.; FREDERICK, Elizabeth; LEE, Cynthia & BOBKO, Philip. Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 69, n. 2, p. 241-251. 1984.
LU, June; YU, Chun-Sheng; LIU, Chang & YAO, James E. Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Polic, v. 13, n. 3, p. 206-222, 2003.
MA, Qingxiong & LIU, Liping. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of End User Computing, v. 16, n. 1, p. 59-72, January/March, 2004.
MARCHEWKA, Jack T.; LIU, Chang & KOSTIWA, Kurt. An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, v. 7, n. 2, p. 93-104, 2007.
MOORE, Gary C. & BENBASAT, Izak. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, v. 2, n. 3, p. 92-222, September, 1991.
NOTANI, Arti S. Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, v. 7, n. 3, p. 247-271, 1998.
O’REILLY, Tim. What is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Verlag, September, 2005. Available at: http://www.oreilly.de/artikel/web20.html. Retrieved: August 1, 2008.
PLOUFFE, Christopher R.; HULLAND, John S. & VANDENBOSCH, Mark. Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions: understanding merchant adoption of a smartcard-based payment system. Information Systems Research, v. 12, n. 2, 208-222, June, 2001.
ROGERS, Everett M. Diffusion of innovations. 4. ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
ROSENZWEIG, Roy. Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past. Journal of American History, v. 93, n. 1, p. 117-146, June, 2006.
SHEPPARD, Blair H.; HARTWICK, Jon & WARSHAW, Paul R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 15, n. 3, p. 325-343, December, 1988.
TAYLOR, Shirley & TODD, Peter. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, v. 12, n. 2, p. 137-155, July, 1995.
TAN, Margaret & TEO, Thompson S. H. Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 2, n. 3, p. 5-18, March, 1998.
THOMPSON, Ronald L.; HIGGINS, Christopher A. & HOWELL, Jane M. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, v. 15, n. 1, p. 124-143, March, 1991.
TRIANDIS, Harry C. Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1977.
VALLERAND, Robert J. & BISSONNETTE, Robert. Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: a prospective study. Journal of Personality, v. 60, n. 3, p. 599-620, September, 1992.
VENKATESH, Viswanath. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, v. 11, n. 4, p. 342-365, 2000.
VENKATESH, Viswanath & DAVIS, Fred D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, v. 46, n. 2, p. 186-204, February, 2000.
VENKATESH, Viswanath. & MORRIS, Michael G. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, v. 24, n. 1, p. 115-139, March, 2000.
VENKATESH, Viswanath; MORRIS, Michael G.; DAVIS, Gordon B. & DAVIS, Fred D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, v. 27, n. 3, p. 425-478, September, 2003.
VUONG, Ba-Quy; LIM, Ee-Peng; SUN, Aixim; LE, Minh-Tam; LAUW, Hady Wirawan & CHANG, Kuiyu. On ranking controversies in Wikipedia: models and evaluation. In: 1st INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SEARCH AND WEB DATA MINING – WSDM 2008. Proceedings of... Stanford: ACM, 2008. p. 171-182.
WIKIPEDIA WEBSITE. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2008a. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#cite_note-Who13. Retrieved: August 10, 2008.
______. Wikipedia: Academic use. 2008b. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use#cite_note-0. Retrieved: August 10, 2008.
______. Wikipedia: Encyclopedia. 2008c. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia#cite_note-0. Retrieved: October 30, 2008.
WIXOM, Barbara H. & TODD, Peter A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, v. 16, n. 1, p. 85-102, March, 2005.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Yin-Leng Theng, Jiang Tao

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os autores que publicam trabalhos na RIA estão de acordo com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm seus direitos autorais e concedem à RIA o direito à primeira publicação. Admite-se o compartilhamento do referido trabalho, desde que seja reconhecida sua autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores podem fechar contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na RIA, com reconhecimento de sua autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores podem publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online, antes ou durante o processo editorial.